St.Brigid's CollegeSt.Brigid's CollegeSt.Brigid's College
St.Brigid's College
Main Page
News & Information
Virtual School Tour
About St.Brigid's
Photo Gallery
Contact Us
School Facilities
Departments
Map/Directions
School Publications
Transition Year
Leaving Certificate
Post Leaving Course
Departments

Irish
English
Mathematics
The Sciences
Business & I.T
Modern Languages
Humanities
The Arts
Home Economics
Sports
Religious and Social Education

Hall of Residence

Main Page
Accommodation
Facilities
Contact Us

The Impressionists - with some text from Ms. D. Kane.

"A nineteenth century movement in painting, originating in France, aiming at the realistic representation of the play of light in nature, purporting to render faithfully what the artist actually saw, dispensing with the academic rules of composition and colouring".

Main exponents

Edward Manet (1832-1883)
Claude Monet (1840-1926)
Camille Pissarro (1830-1903)
Edgar Degas (1834-1917)
Auguste Renoir (1841-1919)
Auguste Rondin (1840-1917) - Sculptor


Important "Others"

Berthe Morisit (1841-1895)
Mary Cassatt

The movement spanned the 1870's and 1880's and was founded primarily in France [Paris]

It was at their first Impressionist exhibition (1874) that the term "Impressionism" was coined by the art critic Leroy in reaction to Monets' 'Impression Sunrise', he remarked;

"Impression - I was sure of it, I was just telling myself that, since I was impressed, there had to be an impression in it......and what freedom, what ease of workmanship! Wallpaper in its embryonic state is more finished than this seascape"

What began as a slur became their battle cry which united them in the face of widespread ridicule. The movement was forged of individuals whose evolution as a group was influenced and moulded by strong economic and social changes. Whilst there was no espoused many characteristics and beliefs underpin their work.

In order to gain a further understanding of the evolution and maturation of impressionism we will consider the following areas for investigation;

1. Historical Roots of Impressionism
2. Chief characteristics of Impressionist paintings [Summary]
3. After Impressionism
4. Links


Historical Roots of Impressionism

(The following section traces the key historical influences which moulded the emergent impressionist movement. The format is primarily one of discursive/narrative point form)-this section will explore the impressionists artistic inheritance as well as the society in which they worked.

Various attitudes shared by the Impressionists found their roots chiefly in the works of Constable, Delacroix, the Dutch landscape painters, Corot, Boudin and Jenykind, Courbet and Manet.

The Impressionists, like the Romantic painters before them shared a distaste for painting that was too formal or overworked, what E.H Gombrich refers to as 'the fault of the faultless". Accordingly Impressionist works were characteristically loose and informal in both style and subject matter.

They also shared the concept of the independent artist as a man/woman always at war with accepted opinion and continually exploring the new and the unknown.

The romantic movement had begun the move away from historical or religious motifs as a basis for painting, selecting instead everyday scenes from the countryside and day to day living. They believed that this portrayed "nature" more faithfully than the modelling from the antique methods and formulas of their predecessors.

The impressionists sought " truth" through their paintings and in particular a true rendering of light and colour. They sought truth both in their choice of and their portrayal of a scene/image.

The traditionalists (who sought Salon acclaim) thought that nature in the raw lacked the sense of permanence and nobility which could only be imparted to it. It's elements were rearranged to form an idealised whole. They also maintained that landscape should be embellished with human figures borrowed from the classical tradition The Salon which, until Courbet and Manet opened their salons remained the only place where a young painter could show his work.

Their works provide a historical and sociological portrayed of an era where there was intense industrialisation, depopulation of the countryside, city overcrowding etc... and these social changes are reflected in many impressionist works.

The painters bond with nature was often founded upon a genuine scientific curiosity and the desire for accuracy which prompted Degas to execute studies of different kinds of smoke and makes of bread. Even constable executed paintings which explored different climatic conditions where he noted the time of day and wind direction etc... Roussean too in "Marshy Landscape" and "Valley of Tiffange" paid great attention to the rendering of rocks and marshy grounds whilst Ruskin in "Modern Painters" subjects the sky and earth to a similar scientific analysis. Even Turner had himself strapped to the mast of a ship to observe the dynamics of of tempest.With the acceleration of scientific knowledge, gradually, for painters and writers alike " the true " was replacing the beautiful as a word of praise. This change was epitomised by Sainte - Beef - Manet's friend and one of Deja's favourite and authors:

" The beautiful, the true, the good
is a fine slogan and yet it is
specious. If I had a slogan it
would the true, the true alone
and let the beautiful and the good
get alone as well as they can ".

This pursuit of the truth encouraged many artists to work outdoors - plein-airism. This requires them to workquickly and swiftly to obtain accurate records which often resulted in the rough application of paint andvisible choppy brushstrokes.

The scientist heralded as having the greatest impact on Impressionistic works is Eugene Chevreul. Chevreuls research influenced the impressionists use and application of colour. As the director of a dyeing department in Gobelins tapestry in Paris, Chevreul researched colour harmonies which resulted in his book "The Principles of Harmony and contrast of Colours, and their application in the Arts" his main observations were:

* Colours near one another influence and modify each other.
* Any colour seen alone appear to be surrounded by a faint aureole of its complementary colour. e.g. a
   violetspot on a white background will seem to tint its background yellow.
* Optical mixing, Chevreul, through his experiments with coloured threads, noted that two threads of different
   dye colour appear to have a single colour when seen together at a distance.

There is evidence that Monet and Pissaro and Femrat had first hand knowledge of his work. It was this theory of optical mixing which eventually lead the Impressionists to tinge shadows with colours complementary to the colour of the object casting the shadow. Furthermore, this theory led them to juxtapose (place side by side) on the canvas for the eye to fuse at a distance, thus producing colours more intense than could be achieved by mixing on the palette. The Impressionists also profited from the discovery the juxtapose d complementary colours, when used in large enough areas, intensify each other, whereas when used in small quantities they fuse into a neutral tone.

Constables maxim "Remember that light and shadow never stand still" is an underlying structure of the Impressionist movement. Impressionism sought to give a true rendering of light at a particular time - -to catch the fleeting lighting or climatic effect. Sometimes this was done to such an extent that structural and linear qualities became sketchy / distorted. (e.g. see Renoir: La Gare St Lazare or Monet: Rouen Cathedral)

Another scientific advance; that of photography influenced Impressionism. This provided the artists with different compositional alternatives and many impressionist works have a snapshot pictorial quality e.g. Renoir's "Moulin de la Galette". Some feared photography would rival art but the colouring of the Impressionists works were under no threat.

Japanese prints had also influenced Impressionist artists and this was echoed in their use of flat areas of colour and elimination of detail. (See "Portrait if Zola" by Bazille).

The impressionist pictures do not tell a story, they merely give an impression of a scene and consequently they often appear deceptively simple. They were dedicated individuals who were often rewarded by the ridicule of their contemporaries.


Copyright © 2005 St.Brigid's - All rights reserved | Site best viewed in 1024x768 | Page last updated 16-Oct-2007